Excerpts from Greg Smith's message of mié oct 05 04:02:12 -0300 2011:
> 
> On 09/29/2011 10:40 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I reviewed this patch.  My question for you is: does it make sense to
> > enable to reporting of write rate even when vacuum cost accounting is
> > enabled?  In my opinion it would be useful to do so.  If you agree,
> > please submit an updated patch.
> 
> Presumably you meant to ask if this makes sense to show when cost 
> accounting isn't enabled, because the code doesn't do that right now.  
> No cost accounting, no buffer usage/write rate data as this was submitted.

Yes, sorry, that's what I meant.

> Looks like making this work even in cases where cost accounting isn't on 
> will make the patch a bit larger obtrusive, but it's not unreasonable.  
> Now that you mention it, people who do a manual, full-speed VACUUM would 
> certainly appreciate some feedback on the rate it ran at.  I'll include 
> that in the next update.

Thanks.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to