Excerpts from Greg Smith's message of mié oct 05 04:02:12 -0300 2011: > > On 09/29/2011 10:40 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > I reviewed this patch. My question for you is: does it make sense to > > enable to reporting of write rate even when vacuum cost accounting is > > enabled? In my opinion it would be useful to do so. If you agree, > > please submit an updated patch. > > Presumably you meant to ask if this makes sense to show when cost > accounting isn't enabled, because the code doesn't do that right now. > No cost accounting, no buffer usage/write rate data as this was submitted.
Yes, sorry, that's what I meant. > Looks like making this work even in cases where cost accounting isn't on > will make the patch a bit larger obtrusive, but it's not unreasonable. > Now that you mention it, people who do a manual, full-speed VACUUM would > certainly appreciate some feedback on the rate it ran at. I'll include > that in the next update. Thanks. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers