Robert Haas wrote: > Markus Wanner took a crack at generalizing the autovacuum machinery > that we have now into something that could be used to fire up > general-purpose worker processes, but it fell down mostly because I > (and, I think, others) weren't convinced that imessages were something > we wanted to suck into core, and Markus reasonably enough wasn't > interested in rewriting it to do something that wouldn't really help > his work with Postgres-R. I'm not sure where Bruce is getting his > timeline from, but I think the limiting factor is not so much that we > don't have people who can write the code as that those people are > busy, and this is a big project. But you can bet that if it gets to > the top of Tom's priority list (just for example) we'll see some > motion...!
I was thinking of setting up a team to map out some strategies and get community buy-in, and then we could attack each issue. I got the 2-3 years from the Win32 timeline. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
