On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:51:03PM +0900, Shigeru Hanada wrote: > At a quick glance, this patch seems to have an issue about priority. > Which value is used if an option has been set both on a foreign table > and a foreign server?
I believe that the finer-grained setting should always override the coarser, so in this case, the setting for the table should take precedence over the setting for the server. > Also I think documents and regression tests would be required for > this kind of change. +1 :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
