On 10/11/2011 11:53 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >> Is this a TODO? We might not want to make work_mem SUSET, but it >> would allow administrators to control this. > > Well, we've identified a few people who like the idea, but I'm not > sure we have the degree of consensus we normally look for before > putting something on the TODO list.
That's pretty much what I was thinking. > After the discussion on this thread, are there still any *objections* > to allowing bounds or subsets to be SUSET to limit GUC values more > strictly than the limits hard-coded in C? No objections here. Joe -- Joe Conway credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
