Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> [implement "clustered index" as a covering index with all columns >> which are present in the heap]
> I guess we could do that, but I'm not convinced there would be > much benefit. The "traditional" way to implement a clustered index is to have the leaf level of the index contain the tuples rather than pointers to the tuples. If we're going to do clustered tables, we might want to jump all the way to that, rather than a half-way solution which stores everything twice. -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
