On Oct 13, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> Certainly not in 9.2, no. Not sure about 9.1, though.
> 
> Well, right now 9.1 is returning some rather random results.  If we
> don't change it, someone might claim that later releases ought to be
> compatible with that ...

Okay then, works for me.

D


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to