Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie oct 14 11:56:22 -0300 2011: > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric_Villemain?= <cedric.villemain.deb...@gmail.com> > > > writes: > > > > 2011/10/14 Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us>: > > > >> Should this be marked as TODO? > > > > > > > I suppose TODO items *are* wanted and so working on them should remove > > > > the pain to convince people here to accept the feature, aren't they ? > > > > > > There is plenty of stuff in the TODO list for which there is no > > > consensus. > > > > Uh, we should probably remove those then. Can you think of any? > > The guideline, last I checked, was that before getting into coding any > item from the TODO list, the prospective hacker should check previous > discussions and initiate a new one on this list to ensure consensus. > Unless something is blatantly "not wanted", I don't think it should be > removed from the TODO list. There not being consensus does not mean > that there cannot ever be.
OK. But if we are pretty sure we don't want something, e.g. hibernate, we shouldn't add it. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
