Pavel Stehule <[email protected]> writes:
> 2011/10/15 Robert Haas <[email protected]>:
>> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Pavel Stehule <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> I have no problem with this. Â A context can be false for info and true
>>> for other in default. Please, use a different identifier than
>>> "context", that can be use for reading context in future - maybe
>>> "attach_context" or some similar.
>> error_context?
> what about show_context, hide_context, hold_context, use_context ??
I still think it should be CONTEXT, period. All the other options to
RAISE are named directly after the message lines they control; why
should this one be different?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
