On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes: >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >>> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3629.html > >> I'm still confused. The input string is already known to be valid >> UTF-8, so the second byte (if there is one) must be between 0x80 and >> 0xBF. Therefore it will be neither 0xED nor 0xF4. > > I haven't read the patch lately, but ED and F4 are special as *first* > bytes. Maybe the logic isn't quite right, or you read it wrong?
I think I'll let the patch author comment on that. It looks wrong to me, but I just work here. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
