On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > On 10/25/11 5:03 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> If we want something to go in early, that could be as simple as a >> version of pg_basebackup that runs against the slave but only if >> full_page_writes=on on the master. If it's not, it throws an error. >> Then we can improve upon that by adding handling of fpw=off, first by >> infrastructure, then by tool. > > Just to be clear, the idea is to require full_page_writes to do backup > from the standby in 9.2, but to remove the requirement later?
Yes unless I'm missing something. Not sure if we can remove that in 9.2, though. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
