On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote: > Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes: >> If we introduce "walrestore" process, pg_standby seems no longer useful. > > pg_standby is one possible restore_command, right? I had understood > that walrestore would be the process that cares for running that > command, not another implementation of it.
Yes, that was the idea. > That said, I would really like us to provide a default restore command, > so if you had any intend of handling the restoring command in the > walrestore process, by all means, go ahead :) A different proposal, I think. Not no, just not here and now. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
