On 08.11.2011 20:46, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
2011-11-08 18:53 keltezéssel, Heikki Linnakangas írta:
What do people think of backpatching this? I'm inclined to backpatch, on the
grounds
that the macro that detoasts and depacks should always work (ie. after this
patch), even
if the depacking isn't necessary and introduces an extra palloc+copy, but the
reverse is
not true.
On the grounds that 9.0.x also shows the problem with
the stock macro, backporting would be nice. I don't know
which older trees may show the problem, I only tested with
9.0 and 9.1.
Packed varlenas were introduced in 8.3 - this hasn't changed since then.
Committed and backpatched all the way to 8.3.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
