Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> Well, we could use an optional "details" string for that.  If not, we
> are still using the magic-string approach, which I thought we didn't
> like.

No, we're not using magic strings, we're using an enum --- maybe not an
officially declared enum type, but it's a column with a predetermined
set of possible values.  It would be a magic string if it were still in
the "query" field and thus confusable with user-written queries.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to