Kevin Grittner wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > > I realize the patch only added 1-2 new const functions > > No, version 2 of the patch used the strchr() technique and has > *zero* new functions and *zero* new macros.
Right. I was referring to the non-strchr() approach in the initial patch. > > but this is only a small area of the code being patched --- a full > > solution would have many more complex duplicates, and awkward > > changes as we add features. > > I'm not convinced of that, and I don't think it really has a bearing > on doing where it can be done with no new functions and no changes > to the code other than adding "const" to existing lines of code. Right, again I was referring to the non-strchr() approach, e.g. new functions. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
