Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: >> To actually get rid of acldefault, we'd have to do that not only for >> types but for all objects with ACLs. That's a LOT of catalog bulk, >> and like Robert I'm not seeing much benefit. It's not unreasonable >> to want the typical case to be small and fast.
> A LOT of catalog bulk..? Am I missing something here? What I'm missing is what actual benefit we get from spending the extra space. (No, I don't believe that changing the defaults is something that users commonly will or should do; it's certainly not the case to optimize for.) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers