On 14 November 2011 15:07, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: > > On 14 November 2011 13:32, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> But Tom's point about XIDs and LSNs seems like it kind of puts a > >> bullet through the heart of the whole idea. > > > > What about having database-level XIDs rather than cluster-level? Is that > > remotely feasible? > > Maybe. You'd need a set separate set for shared catalogs, too. It > seems like a heck of a lot of work, though, especially since (IME, > anyway) most people only really one run one database per cluster. > Thought it would be a lot of work. Well one benefit I could potentially see is paving the way for per-database replication. But I'll let this dream go as it's clearly not something to realistically pursue. -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
