On 11/16/11 7:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Heck, we don't even have a field bug report that the design limitation > is causing any real problems for real users ... so IMO, the claims that > this is dangerously broken are a bit overblown.
This is why I mentioned clients using ISBN in production. I have yet to see any actual breakage in the field. Granted, both clients are US-only. I don't believe either of these clients is depending on the prefix-check, and that's the sort of thing we could announce in the release notes. I do get the feeling that Peter got burned by ISN, given his vehemence in erasing it from the face of the earth. So that's one bug report. ;-) -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
