Excerpts from Martijn van Oosterhout's message of jue nov 24 04:40:42 -0300 2011:
> How about the "service" option, that's a nice way of handling > non-default socket options. What about it? Are you suggesting we should support some way to specify a service name in the URI? If so, consider this: if you set up a pg_service.conf file, and then pass around a URI that specifies a service, no one else can use the URI until you also pass around the service file. So, in that light, do we still think that letting the user specify a service name in the URI makes sense? (My personal opinion is yes). -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
