Excerpts from Dean Rasheed's message of vie nov 25 13:45:34 -0300 2011: > Looking back at Thom's original example, it seems odd to allow this > syntax at all: > > CREATE TABLE a ( > num integer, > CONSTRAINT meow CHECK ((num < 20)) NOT VALID > ); > > It's not documented, but is currently allowed. However, since all data > subsequently added to the table is checked against the constraint, the > constraint is guaranteed to be valid, so there seems to be no point in > allowing it to be declared NOT VALID.
Hah ... interesting. Not sure it's worth fussing about this. If the user shoots himself in the foot by declaring an unvalidated constraint, which is not even documented, are we really at fault? -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
