On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes: >>>> Well, if we apply this, it has the possibility to break existing >>>> dumps. > > BTW, it occurs to me that we could dodge that objection, with much less > work than Robert suggests, if we just made the message be a WARNING not > an ERROR. I think that'd do just as well in terms of what the message > could usefully accomplish, ie, steer people away from doing things that > won't work. Still not sure that it's worth doing though, >
i'm fine with a WARNING -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
