On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It also strikes me that anything > that is based on augmenting the walsender/walreceiver protocol leaves > anyone who is using WAL shipping out in the cold. I'm not clear from > the comments you or Simon have made how important you think that use > case still is. archive_timeout > 0 works just fine at generating files even when quiet, or if it does not, it is a bug. So I don't understand your comments, please explain. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
