Robert Haas wrote: > On that theory, I'm inclined to think that's not really a problem. > We'll go nuts if we refuse to commit anything until it shows a > meaningful win on every imaginable workload, and it seems like this > can't really be worse than the status quo; any case where it is must > be some kind of artifact. We're better of getting rid of as much > ProcArrayLock contention as possible, rather than keeping it around > because there are corner cases where it decreases contention on some > other lock.
Interesting conclusion, and it makes sense. Seems once this is applied we will have more places to look for contention improvements. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
