Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > We have a big user community and what _you_ want for this feature is > > only a small part of our decision on what is needed. Robert's concern > > that this might not be useful enough for the general use-cases people > > want is a legitimate, if difficult to hear, analysis. > > Agreed, his concern is legitimate. Now, I've never been trying to > implement a generic event trigger system and I don't know what it would > take to implement such a beast. > > Transaction BEGIN, COMMIT, and ROLLBACK triggers anyone? not me?:) > > Exploring if my proposal would be a pain to maintain once we have a fully > generic event trigger system someday is legitimate, asking me to design > both the generic event system and the command triggers so that they fit > in is just asking for too much.
Agreed. I am not against this addition, just pointing out that we have to be careful. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
