On Dec 20, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Claes Jakobsson wrote:

> Are people explicitly asking for a) *JSON* datatype or b) a type that lets 
> you store arbitrary complex semi-untyped data structures?

Yes.

> if b) then this might get a lot more interesting

JSON is the most popular/likely way to represent that, I think.

David


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to