On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Florian Pflug <f...@phlo.org> wrote: > On Jan4, 2012, at 21:27 , Robert Haas wrote: >> I think the first thing we need to look at is increasing the number of >> CLOG buffers. > > What became of the idea to treat the stable (i.e. earlier than the oldest > active xid) and the unstable (i.e. the rest) parts of the CLOG differently.
I'm curious -- anyone happen to have an idea how big the unstable CLOG xid space is in the "typical" case? What's would be the main driver of making it bigger? What are the main tradeoffs in terms of trying to keep the unstable area compact? merlin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
