On 01/05/2012 10:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Unconditional sv_mortalcopy sounds like the thing to do then, but a comment would help. And if this isn't a Perl bug, I would like to know what is.
Indeed. David, can you file a bug on this?
BTW, shouldn't we be making some attempt to drop the result of the sv_mortalcopy? Or is it just assumed that it will be garbage-collected before the memory leak gets too bad?
Yes, it will be garbage collected before long. See discussion in perldoc perlguts.
cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers