On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Five-minute pgbench run, scale factor 100, >> permanent tables, my usual config settings. Somewhat depressingly, >> virtually all of the interesting activity still centers around the >> same three locks > > We've seen clear evidence that the performance profile changes over > time, with certain artifacts becoming more prominent. > > Running exactly the same tests repeatedly is useful to derive the > historical perspectives, but we need a wider spread of tests to be > certain that the work done is generally applicable. > > I'd be interested to see results from a 30 minute run, focusing on > what happens in minutes 10-30, if you have time.
Yeah, that seems like a good test to run. I do have time, but Nate Boley's test machine is currently otherwise occupied, so I can't run that test just now. I will run it when/if an opportunity presents itself... -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
