Bruce Momjian writes: > Can we move them to src/port rather than src/utils? Port makes more > sense to me because that's what they are. Maybe is should be called > src/libc?
Well, there is a bit of a history in picking a really silly name for this library. GCC calls it libiberty, Kerberos calls it libroken. Make up your own. "port" makes sense, though. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
