On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Erik Rijkers <e...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > I'm not sure, but it does look like this is the "mystery" bug that I > encountered repeatedly > already in 9.0devel; but I was never able to reproduce it reliably. But I > don't think it was ever > solved. > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-03/msg00223.php
I also encountered the same issue one year before: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-11/msg01579.php At that moment, I identified its cause: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-11/msg01700.php At last it was fixed: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-11/msg01910.php But Steve encountered it again, which means that the above fix is not sufficient. Unless the issue is derived from my patch, we should do another cycle of diagnosis of it. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
