On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm working on it. Good, thanks for the update. >> The remaining patch you tested was withdrawn and not submitted to the CF. > > Oh. Which one was that? I thought all of these were in play. freelist_ok was a prototype for testing/discussion, which contained an arguable heuristic. I guess that means its also "in play", but I wasn't thinking we'd be able to assemble clear evidence for 9.2. The other patches have clearer and specific roles without heuristics (mostly), so are at least viable for 9.2, though still requiring agreement. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
