On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > It's a bit disturbing that nobody has reported this from the field yet. > Seems to imply that hot standby isn't being used much.
I have seen this, but didn't get to dig in, as I thought it could be a problem from other things done outside Postgres (it also came up in #6200, but I didn't mention it). Consider it retroactively reported. -- fdr -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
