Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 02/07/2012 12:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In general I think we'd have to require that colnames be supplied in all
>> RowExprs if we go this way. Anyplace that's trying to slide by without
>> will have to be fixed. I don't recall how many places that is.
> I just had a thought that maybe we could make this simpler by dummying
> up a list of colnames if we don't have one, instead of that assertion.
> Or am I on the wrong track.
Well, if there are more than one or two RowExpr creators for which a
dummy set of colnames is the best we can do anyway, that might be a
reasonable answer. But I think it would encourage people to be lazy
and let the dummy colnames be used even when they can do better, so
I'd rather not take this as a first-choice solution.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
