Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Has anybody stopped to look at the SQL standard for this? In-line > trigger definitions are actually what they intend, IIRC.
In which language? Do we need to include PL/PSM to be compliant, and use that by default? In that case we might want to force people to spell out LANGUAGE plpgsql when we don't provide for PSM yet, so that we avoid some backwards compatibility problems down the road. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
