>> Guys, are we talking about an on-disk format change? If so, this may >> need to be kicked out of 9.2 ... > > Yes, we are. Simon's gone to some pains to make it backward > compatible, but IMHO it's a lot messier and less future-proof than it > could be with some more work, and if we commit this patch than we WILL > be stuck with this for a very long time.
Yeah. I'd personally prefer to boot this to 9.3, then. It's not like there's not enough features for 9.2, and I really don't want this feature to cause 5 others to be delayed. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
