On 02/22/2012 11:10 AM, Jay Levitt wrote:
N.B.: Windows has at least two clock APIs, timeGetTime and
QueryPerformanceCounters (and probably more, these days). They rely on
different hardware clocks, and can get out of sync with each other;
meanwhile, QueryPerformanceCounters can get out of sync with itself on
(older?) multi-CPU boards.

The PostgreSQL wrapper in src/include/portability/instr_time.h uses QueryPerformanceCounter and QueryPerformanceFrequency in a way that the result can be used similarly to how deltas in UNIX dates are returned.

As far as I've been able to tell, there aren't any issues unique to Windows there. Multiple cores can have their TSC results get out of sync on Windows for the same reason they do on Linux systems, and there's also the same frequency/temperature issues.

Newer versions of Windows can use TSC, older versions only use HPET or ACPI on older versions, and there's some ability to force bad TSC units to use ACPI instead:

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/psssql/archive/2010/08/18/how-it-works-timer-outputs-in-sql-server-2008-r2-invariant-tsc.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/psssql/archive/2010/08/18/how-it-works-timer-outputs-in-sql-server-2008-r2-invariant-tsc.aspx

There is a lot of questionable behavior if you try to use the better timers in Windows XP; check out the obnoxious foot note about XP SP3 at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Precision_Event_Timer for example.

Since there's little you can do about--it's not even possible to figure out which timer is being used easily--I didn't see any easy ways to document what Windows does here, in a way that helped anyone. For the most part, you get the best timer Windows has a driver for with QueryPerformanceCounter, and that's what the PostgreSQL code uses. The information I gave about how newer systems can have more accurate timing is still accurate. Maybe it would be useful to add something pointing out that newer Windows versions tend to support faster timers, too. That's something I assume people would guess from what I already wrote, it may be worth stating explicitly though.


--
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    g...@2ndquadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to