On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Options >> >> (1) Recovery ignores checksums until db in consistent state >> >> (2) Recovery ignores checksums until all databases are enabled, when >> we set flag in pg_control >> >> (3) Recovery checks blocks marked as having a checksum, no matter the >> overall state > > How about combining #1 and #3? If the database isn't consistent yet > (and thus we can't look at pg_database) then we rely on the blocks > themselves to tell us whether they have checksums. Once we reach > consistency we can do better. We can change state then, but to what? We don't have a relcache. Maybe that puts us back at Square #1. Will think -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
