On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On mån, 2012-03-05 at 19:37 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> The exact case is that the user was using plpython2u in PG 9.0, but >> the PG 9.1 one-click installer only supplies plpython3u. > > That seems like a pretty stupid choice to me, if it's true. > > That doesn't address your issue, but users shouldn't be forced to drop > their languages during an upgrade in the first place.
Hmm. I had been thinking that it is only possible to support one or the other, thus the need for a compatibility break at some point would be forced, but reading the documentation, it seems that it we can ship both as long as nobody tries to use both at the same time. I wonder why we didn't do that. Dave? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
