2012/3/7 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> yes
>>
>> 2012/2/27 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>:
>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hello
>>>>
>>>> I tested creating some larger indexes
>>>>
>>>> There was a warning:
>>>>
>>>> postgres=# CREATE INDEX idx_resource_name ON resource (name, tid);
>>>> WARNING:  concurrent insert in progress within table "resource"
>>>>
>>>> I am sure so there was only one active session - so this warning is 
>>>> strange.
>>>>
>>
>> sure
>>
>> I tried generate data from
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2012-02/msg00210.php
>> example
>>
>> I used pg from yesterday GIT repository
>>
>> and my configuration was
>>
>> shared buffers 500MB
>> maintenance_work_mem 200MB
>> wal_buffers 64MB
>> checkpoint_segments 32
>
> Is this repeatable?
>

I didn't repeated this test, but I'll check it tomorrow.

Pavel

> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to