Robert Haas wrote: > Well, I guess I'm still of the opinion that the real question is > whether the particular lint checks that Pavel's implemented are good > and useful things. Has anyone spent any time looking at *that*?
Actually, I did when I reviewed the patch the first time round. I think that the checks implemented are clearly good and useful, since any problem reported will lead to an error at runtime if a certain code path in the function is taken. And if the code path is never taken, that's valuable information too. I don't say that there are no good checks missing, but the ones that are there are good IMO. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
