On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > If we're going to go the ad-hoc route, there seems little reason to be > considering a core patch at all. Freestanding checkers could just as > well be independent projects.
I completely agree. I think there is little reason to be considering a core patch. I haven't seen any convincing evidence (or any evidence at all) that being able to fling checkers at a large number of functions written in different procedural languages is an important use case for anyone. I think the vast majority of checking will get done one function at a time; and therefore we are gilding the lily. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
