On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:46:24PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> > I agree with you that some worst case performance tests should be
>> > done. Could you please say what you think the worst cases would be, so
>> > those can be tested? That would avoid wasting time or getting anything
>> > backwards.
>>
>> I've thought about this some and here's what I've come up with so far:
>
> I question whether we are in a position to do the testing necessary to
> commit this for 9.2.

Is anyone even working on testing it?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to