Dimitri Fontaine <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> writes: > Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: >> If you think "cmdtrigger" isn't a good name maybe you should have >> picked a different one to start with.
> Well, I think it's a good internal name. I'm not too sure about exposing > it, the only reason why it's a good name is because it's a single not > too long word, after all. Not very âSQLishâ. > I'm putting cmdtrigger as the user visible name in the next version of > the patch, if you come up with something potentially more user friendly > feel free to suggest. How about "commandtrigger" or "command_trigger"? Typing a few more characters in this context doesn't seem like a deal-breaker to me. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers