On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 08:11:17PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie mar 16 20:06:28 -0300 2012: > > Àlvaro told me he got a Spanish-language report that pg_upgrade > > failed because it required pg_config, and pg_config is only supplied > > with the devel packages. > > > > I initially thought that it was a packaging problem, but I later > > realized the pg_config is mostly developer settings, and that using > > pg_config was not getting any change to libdir by dynamic_library_path > > in postgresql.conf, and that I should just merge the pg_upgrade_support > > detection code into the existing shared library detection "LOAD" code I > > already had. > > > > This avoids the pg_config dependency, works better for libdir, and > > reduces the amount of code. > > Bruce also found a reference to this old bug report: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2011-12/msg00254.php > This includes a link to a Debian bug report by Peter. > > > Patch attached. Should this be backpatched to PG 9.1; I think so. > > +1
Applied, and backpatched to 9.1. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
