On fre, 2012-03-16 at 13:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I'm a bit concerned about whether that's actually going to be useful. > A quick check shows that in the regression database, the proposed patch > produces 3246 possible completions, which suggests that by the time you > get down to a unique match you're going to have typed most of the name > anyway.
Well, the regression test database is not really an example of real-life object naming, I think. I tried this out on a couple of real databases and found it quite handy. > > BTW, you should at least exclude dropped columns, I think. > Yes. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
