On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié mar 21 21:50:24 -0300 2012: >> heap_freeze_tuple() was apparently designed at one point to cope with >> being called with either a shared or exclusive buffer lock. But none >> of the current callers call it with a shared lock; they all call it >> with an exclusive lock, except for the heap-rewrite code which doesn't >> take (or need) a lock at all. > >> Since this is just dead code removal, I propose to apply this to 9.2. > > +1
Thanks, done. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
