Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Daniel Farina <dan...@heroku.com> wrote: >> Is there a hypothetical DBA that doesn't want a mere-mortal user >> to be able to signal one of their own backends to do "cancel >> query, rollback the transaction, then close the socket"? If so, >> why? Setting aside possible bugs in the mechanism, I have trouble imagining a use-case where it would be undesirable to allow this. > Well, I guess if you have different people sharing the same > user-ID, you probably wouldn't want that. As Tom pointed out, if there's another person sharing the user ID you're using, and you don't trust them, their ability to cancel your session is likely way down the list of concerns you should have. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
