On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> $ ./pg_archivecleanup -x "bz2" /tmp 000000010000000100000058 >> >> Hmm, but I thought that the idea was that the extension was optional. >> Perhaps I'm missing something but I don't think the previous patch >> will complain about that either; or at least I don't see why the >> behavior should be any different. > > Can someone enlighten me on this point? >
mmm! you're right... it's not complaining either... i was sure it was... and i'm not sure i want to contor things for that... so, just forget my last mail about that... your refactor is just fine for me -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
