Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyot...@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> I'm sorry to have coded a silly bug.
> The previous patch has a bug in realloc size calculation.
> And separation of the 'connname patch' was incomplete in regtest.
> It is fixed in this patch.
I've applied a modified form of the conname update patch. It seemed to
me that the fault is really in the DBLINK_GET_CONN and
DBLINK_GET_NAMED_CONN macros, which ought to be responsible for setting
the surrounding function's conname variable along with conn, rconn, etc.
There was actually a second error of the same type visible in the dblink
regression test, which is also fixed by this more general method.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
