Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 03/31/2012 11:59 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The only simple fix I can see is to rename the symbols in ecpg and
>> pg_dump to something else.  This is probably a good thing anyway to
>> reduce confusion.  Anybody have another idea?

> Seems the sane thing to do.

Done, we'll see how the buildfarm likes this version ...

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to