Excerpts from Greg Stark's message of mié abr 04 14:11:29 -0300 2012: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > , everybody's next few CLOG requests hit some other > > buffer but eventually the long-I/O-in-progress buffer again becomes > > least recently used and the next CLOG eviction causes a second backend > > to begin waiting for that buffer. > > This still sounds like evidence that the slru is just too small for > this transaction rate.
What this statement means to me is that the number of slru buffers should be configurable, not compile-time fixed. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
